top of page

Introduction to a Brief History of Christian Apologetics: What Can We Learn?


The Purpose and the Problems

The Greek word "ἀπολογία" (from "ἀπό" and "λόγος") means a speech in defense. It may be a defense of a fact as true or against a charge as false. The phrase "ἀπολογεῖσθαι δίκην θανατοῦ" means to speak against the sentence of death being passed. In the Apology, Plato presents the defense of Socrates against the charges that led to his death. In the New Testament, Festus declares, "that it is not the custom of the Romans to give up any man before the accused have the accusers face to face and have had opportunity to make his defense (apology) concerning the matter laid against him" (Acts 25:16). Paul uses the term for "the clearing of themselves" by the Corinthians (2 Corinthians 7:11). He addresses the Philippians as partakers with him of grace in "bonds and in the defense (apology) and confirmation of the Gospel" (Philippians 1:7).

The writers who defended Christianity against the arguments and calumnies of Judaism and Paganism in the second and third centuries are described as the Apologists. Tertullian, one of these Apologists, titled his work "Apologeticus" or "Apologeticum." The word "Apologetic" first appeared in English in 1649 in the title "An Apologetic Declaration of the conscientious Presbyterians of the Province of London," and as a noun in Bacon's "Advancement of Learning." The plural form, referring to "the defensive method of argument," appeared around 1733 in North's Lives: "to drop these apologetics." The technical use of the word "Apologetics" as "the argumentative defense of Christianity" appeared in the Penny Cyclopædia in 1834: "The science of apologetics was unknown till the attacks of the adversaries of Christianity assumed a learned and scientific character." The Athenæum in 1882 mentioned "the kind of book … most rational of all in the way of Christian apologetic." Whether in the plural or singular form, it is desirable to treat the word as a collective singular, akin to mathematics, ethics, or aesthetics. The less reputable use of "apology" as an excuse or "apologetic" to describe a servile manner is irrelevant to the meaning of Apologetics.

Before attempting to define the purpose of Apologetics more closely, it is useful to survey prominent writings in this class of Christian literature.

New Testament

The New Testament itself bears an apologetic character, defending Christianity against misunderstandings and opposition. Scott's "The Apologetic of the New Testament" explains that the New Testament reflects the struggle of early Christianity against both Jewish and Pagan opposition. For instance, the Synoptic Gospels defend Jesus' Messiahship, the Fourth Gospel seeks to prove Him as the Incarnate Logos, and the Acts of the Apostles show that Christianity deserves toleration in the Roman Empire.

The New Testament demonstrates a robust apologetic character, defending Christianity against misunderstandings and opposition. Scott's "The Apologetic of the New Testament" explains that the New Testament reflects the struggle of early Christianity against both Jewish and Pagan opposition. For instance, the Synoptic Gospels defend Jesus' Messiahship, the Fourth Gospel seeks to prove Him as the Incarnate Logos, and the Acts of the Apostles show that Christianity deserves toleration in the Roman Empire.

Building on this foundation, the apostolic writings are rich with apologetic content, aimed at both internal and external audiences. The apostle Paul’s epistles are replete with reasoned arguments defending the truth of the gospel. In 1 Corinthians 15, Paul provides a defense of the resurrection by listing eyewitnesses who encountered the risen Christ, thereby establishing the historical reality of this foundational event. His letters to the Galatians and Colossians refute heretical teachings that threatened the purity of the gospel message, affirming the sufficiency of Christ for salvation against Judaizing and proto-Gnostic influences (Galatians 1:6-9; Colossians 2:8-23).

Peter’s letters also exhibit an apologetic purpose. In 1 Peter 3:15, believers are exhorted to always be prepared to give a defense (Greek: "apologia") to anyone who asks for a reason for the hope that is in them. This directive underscores the importance of a reasoned faith, capable of responding to inquiries and challenges. Additionally, 2 Peter 1:16 emphasizes the apostolic eyewitness testimony, asserting that the gospel is not based on cleverly devised myths but on historical events witnessed by the apostles.

The book of Hebrews addresses Jewish Christians, defending the supremacy of Christ over the old covenant and illustrating how Jesus fulfills Old Testament prophecies and typologies. The author systematically argues that Jesus is superior to angels, Moses, and the Levitical priesthood, providing a solid foundation for the faith of believers facing persecution and doubt (Hebrews 1:1-4; 3:1-6; 4:14-16).

John’s epistles, especially 1 John, counter Gnostic heresies by affirming the incarnation and the tangible reality of Jesus' life and ministry. John asserts that the apostles heard, saw, and touched Jesus, emphasizing the physical reality of the Word made flesh (1 John 1:1-3). This direct testimony serves as a defense against doctrines that denied Jesus' true humanity.

In summary, the New Testament is inherently apologetic, addressing various challenges and misconceptions about Christianity. It presents a comprehensive defense of Jesus’ identity, the truth of the resurrection, the authenticity of the apostolic witness, and the doctrinal purity of the gospel. This rich apologetic content continues to equip believers to defend their faith with confidence and clarity.

Early Apologists

The Apologists of the second and third centuries, such as Justin Martyr and Tertullian, defended Christianity against heathen calumnies and persecutions. Their works, such as Justin's "First Apology" and "Dialogue with Trypho," and Tertullian's "Apologeticus," aimed to show the reasonableness of the Christian faith and to address specific accusations.

The Apologists of the second and third centuries, such as Justin Martyr and Tertullian, defended Christianity against heathen calumnies and persecutions. Their works, such as Justin's "First Apology" and "Dialogue with Trypho," and Tertullian's "Apologeticus," aimed to show the reasonableness of the Christian faith and to address specific accusations.

Building upon this foundation, early Christian apologists sought to articulate and defend the faith in the face of both external persecution and internal doctrinal challenges. Their writings were crucial in establishing the intellectual credibility of Christianity in a predominantly pagan world and in countering misconceptions and misrepresentations of Christian beliefs and practices.

Justin Martyr

Justin Martyr (c. 100-165 C.E.) stands out as one of the foremost early apologists. His "First Apology" was addressed to the Roman Emperor Antoninus Pius, defending Christians against charges of atheism and immorality. Justin argued that Christians were loyal subjects who prayed for the emperor and the empire, thereby countering the accusation of political subversion. In his "Dialogue with Trypho," Justin engaged in a detailed debate with a Jewish interlocutor, defending the claim that Jesus is the Messiah prophesied in the Hebrew Scriptures and demonstrating how Jesus fulfilled the Old Testament prophecies.


Tertullian (c. 160-225 C.E.) was another influential apologist whose works significantly contributed to early Christian thought. His "Apologeticus" addressed Roman authorities, refuting common accusations against Christians, such as the charges of cannibalism, incest, and treason. Tertullian argued for the moral superiority of Christianity and highlighted the unjust treatment of Christians, calling for religious tolerance. His assertion "The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the church" underscored the resilience and growth of the Christian faith despite persecution.


Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 130-202 C.E.) played a vital role in defending the orthodox Christian faith against Gnostic heresies. His seminal work, "Against Heresies," systematically refuted the teachings of Gnosticism, emphasizing the continuity between the Old and New Testaments and the apostolic tradition. Irenaeus affirmed the reliability of the apostolic witness and the canonical Scriptures, thereby preserving the doctrinal purity of the early church.

Clement of Alexandria

Clement of Alexandria (c. 150-215 C.E.) sought to present Christianity as the true philosophy that fulfilled the highest aspirations of Greek thought. In his works, such as "Protrepticus" and "Stromata," Clement engaged with Greek philosophy, demonstrating how Christian doctrine provided the ultimate answers to the questions raised by pagan philosophers. He sought to show that faith and reason were not mutually exclusive but complementary.


Origen (c. 185-254 C.E.) was a prolific writer and apologist who addressed both internal theological disputes and external criticisms. His work "Contra Celsum" was a comprehensive rebuttal of the pagan philosopher Celsus, who had written a scathing critique of Christianity. Origen's detailed response not only defended the intellectual integrity of the Christian faith but also presented it as a rational and superior worldview.

The efforts of these early apologists were instrumental in the development of Christian doctrine and the defense of the faith. By engaging with philosophical, religious, and cultural challenges, they helped to articulate a coherent and intellectually robust Christian theology. Their writings provided a foundation for subsequent theological developments and contributed to the establishment of Christianity as a legitimate and respected religion within the Roman Empire.

Early Christian apologists played a crucial role in defending the faith against external attacks and internal heresies. Through their reasoned arguments, engagement with contemporary philosophy, and robust defense of Christian doctrine, they laid the groundwork for the intellectual and theological tradition of the church. Their contributions continue to be valued and studied for their insights and their unwavering commitment to the truth of the gospel.

Augustine's "City of God"

During the decline of Rome, Augustine defended Christianity against the claim that Paganism might have preserved the empire. He contrasted the earthly city of Rome, plagued by vices, with the heavenly city of the Christian Church, sustained by the virtues of its saints.

Augustine's City of God: During the decline of Rome, Augustine defended Christianity against the claim that Paganism might have preserved the empire. He contrasted the earthly city of Rome, plagued by vices, with the heavenly city of the Christian Church, sustained by the virtues of its saints.

Building upon this foundation, Augustine's City of God stands as a monumental work in the realm of Christian apologetics, addressing not only the immediate criticisms of his time but also providing a comprehensive theological vision that has influenced Christian thought for centuries.

Defense Against Pagan Criticisms

In the wake of the sack of Rome by the Visigoths in 410 C.E., many pagans argued that the abandonment of traditional Roman gods in favor of Christianity had led to the empire's decline. Augustine's City of God was written to refute this charge and to defend the Christian faith against such accusations. He meticulously demonstrated that the moral and spiritual decay of Rome was not the result of Christianity but rather stemmed from the inherent corruption within pagan practices and beliefs. By highlighting the numerous calamities that had befallen Rome long before the rise of Christianity, Augustine showed that the empire's troubles were not linked to the Christian God but were a part of the historical pattern of human sin and divine judgment.

The Two Cities: Earthly and Heavenly

A central theme in City of God is the distinction between the "City of Man" (the earthly city) and the "City of God" (the heavenly city). Augustine describes the City of Man as being characterized by self-love, pride, and the pursuit of temporal power and pleasure. In contrast, the City of God is marked by the love of God, humility, and the pursuit of eternal peace and righteousness. This dualism serves to underscore the transient nature of earthly kingdoms and the eternal significance of the heavenly kingdom.

Augustine argues that the ultimate fate of human beings and societies depends not on their allegiance to earthly powers but on their relationship with God. The City of God is eternal, unshaken by worldly events, and sustained by divine virtues. This theological perspective provided Christians with a framework for understanding their place in the world amidst the turmoil of the Roman Empire's decline.

The Providential Role of Christianity

Augustine also uses City of God to articulate a theology of history, where he views the rise and fall of empires within the providential plan of God. He argues that God's sovereignty is at work in human history, using even the decline of Rome for His greater purposes. By doing so, Augustine reassures Christians that their faith is not contingent upon the success of any earthly kingdom but is rooted in the eternal and unchangeable nature of God.

Ethical and Moral Superiority

In his defense of Christianity, Augustine also highlights the ethical and moral superiority of Christian teachings compared to pagan practices. He contrasts the virtues espoused by Christianity—such as humility, charity, and chastity—with the vices prevalent in Roman society, including greed, pride, and moral corruption. By illustrating the transformative power of Christian ethics in the lives of individuals and communities, Augustine demonstrates that Christianity offers a superior moral framework that can lead to true human flourishing.

The Role of the Church

Augustine emphasizes the role of the Church as the visible manifestation of the City of God on earth. The Church, sustained by the Holy Spirit and guided by the teachings of Christ, serves as the means through which believers can grow in holiness and prepare for their ultimate citizenship in the heavenly city. Augustine's vision of the Church as a pilgrim community journeying towards its heavenly home provides a powerful counter-narrative to the claims of pagan critics who saw the decline of Rome as a repudiation of Christian faith.

Philosophical Engagement

In City of God, Augustine engages with contemporary philosophical thought, particularly the works of Plato and the Neoplatonists. He appropriates elements of their philosophy to articulate and defend Christian doctrine, demonstrating the rational coherence of the Christian worldview. By doing so, Augustine not only defends Christianity against pagan criticisms but also presents it as an intellectually robust and philosophically viable faith.

In summary, Augustine's City of God is a profound work of apologetics that addresses the criticisms of paganism, articulates a theology of history, and defends the moral and ethical superiority of Christianity. It offers a compelling vision of the eternal City of God, sustained by divine virtues and destined for eternal glory, in contrast to the transient and flawed nature of earthly cities. Through this work, Augustine provides a robust defense of the Christian faith that continues to resonate with believers today.

Middle Ages

 In the Middle Ages, Anselm's works, such as "Monologium" and "Proslogium," attempted to prove the existence of God and define His nature using reason, combining faith with intellectual inquiry.

In the Middle Ages, Anselm's works, such as "Monologium" and "Proslogium," attempted to prove the existence of God and define His nature using reason, combining faith with intellectual inquiry.

Building upon Anselm's foundation, the medieval period saw significant developments in apologetics through the efforts of other notable scholars who sought to defend and articulate the Christian faith. These scholars aimed to demonstrate the rational coherence of Christian doctrine, engage with contemporary philosophical thought, and respond to objections from various quarters, including Islamic and Jewish scholars, as well as emerging secular philosophies.

Thomas Aquinas

Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) was a preeminent figure in medieval apologetics. His comprehensive work, "Summa Theologica," addressed virtually every aspect of Christian theology, providing detailed arguments for the existence of God, the nature of the soul, and the moral and theological virtues. Aquinas employed Aristotelian philosophy, particularly in his Five Ways, to argue for the existence of God through observation and reason. These arguments include the unmoved mover, the first cause, the necessary being, the argument from degree, and the teleological argument. Aquinas' synthesis of faith and reason set a standard for apologetic discourse, demonstrating that rational inquiry and divine revelation are harmonious.

Peter Abelard

Peter Abelard (1079-1142) contributed significantly to medieval apologetics through his work "Sic et Non" (Yes and No). Abelard compiled theological questions and presented contrasting viewpoints from scripture and early church fathers. His dialectical method encouraged critical thinking and aimed to reconcile apparent contradictions through careful analysis and reasoning. Abelard's approach laid the groundwork for scholasticism, which dominated medieval theological education and apologetics.

The Scholastic Method

The scholastic method, characterized by rigorous dialectical reasoning and systematic theology, was a hallmark of medieval apologetics. Scholars such as Albertus Magnus and Bonaventure further developed this method, engaging deeply with both Christian doctrine and the philosophical ideas of their time. Scholasticism sought to demonstrate the coherence and rationality of the Christian faith, providing a robust intellectual defense against skepticism and alternative worldviews.

Interfaith Dialogues

Medieval apologetics also involved significant interfaith dialogues, particularly with Jewish and Islamic scholars. For example, Raymond Lull (1232-1316) engaged with Islamic philosophy and theology, using reasoned arguments to present the Christian faith to Muslim audiences. His works, such as "The Book of the Gentile and the Three Wise Men," aimed to show the superiority of Christianity through rational discourse.

Augustine's Influence

Augustine's influence pervaded medieval apologetics. His works, especially "City of God" and "Confessions," remained central texts for medieval scholars. Augustine’s integration of faith and reason, along with his emphasis on the transformative power of divine grace, provided a foundational framework for medieval apologetic efforts. His approach to dealing with philosophical objections and his robust defense of Christian doctrines influenced the methodologies of later apologists like Anselm and Aquinas.

Mystical Apologetics

In addition to philosophical and theological defenses, the Middle Ages also saw the rise of mystical apologetics. Mystics like Julian of Norwich and Hildegard of Bingen emphasized personal experiences of God’s presence and love as a form of apologetic witness. These mystics provided a different dimension to apologetics, focusing on the experiential reality of God that complemented the rational arguments of scholastic theologians.

In summary, medieval apologetics was marked by a rich interplay of faith and reason, with scholars like Anselm and Aquinas leading the charge in demonstrating the rational foundations of Christian belief. Through rigorous intellectual inquiry, engagement with contemporary philosophies, and interfaith dialogues, medieval apologists sought to defend and articulate the truths of Christianity in a manner that was intellectually robust and spiritually enriching.


The Reformation saw works like Melanchthon's "Augsburg Confession" and Calvin's "Institutio Christianæ Religionis" defending Reformation doctrines. These works combined dogmatic and apologetic methods, defending the new doctrines against Catholic criticism.

The Reformation saw works like Melanchthon's "Augsburg Confession" and Calvin's "Institutio Christianæ Religionis" defending Reformation doctrines. These works combined dogmatic and apologetic methods, defending the new doctrines against Catholic criticism.

Building upon this, the apologetics of the Reformation were characterized by a robust defense of core Protestant doctrines in response to the theological and institutional challenges posed by the Roman Catholic Church. Reformers sought to return to what they perceived as the biblical foundations of Christianity, emphasizing the authority of Scripture over church tradition and the centrality of faith in Christ for salvation.

Martin Luther

Martin Luther (1483-1546), a seminal figure in the Reformation, utilized apologetics to address the theological and doctrinal issues of his time. His famous Ninety-Five Theses, posted in 1517, sparked significant debate by challenging the practice of selling indulgences and questioning the authority of the Pope. Luther's subsequent writings, such as "The Bondage of the Will," defended the doctrine of sola gratia (grace alone) against the views of Erasmus, emphasizing humanity's total dependence on God's grace for salvation. Luther's "Three Treatises" (1520) — which included "To the Christian Nobility of the German Nation," "The Babylonian Captivity of the Church," and "The Freedom of a Christian" — articulated his theological positions and provided a vigorous defense against Catholic teachings.

Philipp Melanchthon

Philipp Melanchthon (1497-1560), a close collaborator of Luther, played a crucial role in systematizing and defending Reformation theology. His "Augsburg Confession" (1530) was a key document that outlined the beliefs of the Lutheran tradition. Presented at the Diet of Augsburg, it sought to clarify and defend Lutheran doctrines against Catholic criticism, emphasizing justification by faith alone, the authority of Scripture, and the importance of the sacraments. Melanchthon's work helped to articulate a coherent theological framework for the Reformation, providing a basis for dialogue and debate with Catholic authorities.

John Calvin

John Calvin (1509-1564), another leading Reformer, made significant contributions to Reformation apologetics through his comprehensive theological treatise, "Institutio Christianæ Religionis" (Institutes of the Christian Religion). First published in 1536 and subsequently expanded, the "Institutes" provided a systematic exposition of Reformed theology, addressing issues such as predestination, the sovereignty of God, the nature of the church, and the sacraments. Calvin's rigorous intellectual approach and his appeal to Scripture as the ultimate authority in matters of faith and practice were central to his apologetic method. His work not only defended Reformation doctrines against Catholic criticism but also engaged with broader theological and philosophical questions.

The Role of Confessions and Catechisms

During the Reformation, confessions of faith and catechisms played a vital role in apologetics. These documents articulated the beliefs of various Protestant traditions, serving both to educate believers and to defend the faith against external criticism. The "Heidelberg Catechism" (1563), the "Westminster Confession of Faith" (1646), and the "Belgic Confession" (1561) are examples of such works that provided clear and systematic presentations of Reformed theology, aimed at both instruction and defense.

The Emphasis on Sola Scriptura

A central tenet of Reformation apologetics was the principle of sola Scriptura, the belief that Scripture alone is the ultimate authority in matters of faith and practice. This principle stood in contrast to the Catholic view, which held that church tradition and the magisterium also carried authoritative weight. Reformers like Luther, Melanchthon, and Calvin vigorously defended the sufficiency and clarity of Scripture, arguing that all necessary truths for salvation and Christian living are contained within the biblical text. This emphasis on Scripture provided a strong foundation for Reformation apologetics and shaped the theological debates of the period.

Engaging with Catholic Theology

Reformation apologetics also involved direct engagement with Catholic theology. Reformers sought to refute Catholic doctrines such as transubstantiation, the veneration of saints, and the authority of the Pope. They emphasized the priesthood of all believers, the importance of personal faith, and the direct access of individuals to God through Christ. This engagement was not merely polemical but aimed at reclaiming what Reformers saw as the true gospel message obscured by medieval Catholic practices and teachings.

Influence and Legacy

The apologetic efforts of the Reformation had a profound impact on the development of Protestant theology and the broader Christian tradition. The works of Luther, Melanchthon, Calvin, and other Reformers laid the groundwork for subsequent generations of theologians and apologists. Their commitment to the authority of Scripture, the centrality of Christ, and the necessity of faith alone for salvation continues to shape evangelical theology and apologetics today.

In summary, the Reformation era was marked by a vigorous defense of Protestant doctrines through the works of key figures like Luther, Melanchthon, and Calvin. Their writings combined theological exposition with apologetic argumentation, addressing both internal doctrinal issues and external criticisms from the Catholic Church. The emphasis on sola Scriptura, the development of confessions and catechisms, and the direct engagement with Catholic theology were central to the apologetic efforts of the Reformation, leaving a lasting legacy for the evangelical tradition.


In the Enlightenment, Butler's "Analogy of Religion" and Paley's "Natural Theology" addressed Deism by arguing for the reasonableness of Christianity. Butler showed that natural religion had more difficulties than revealed religion, while Paley's design argument demonstrated the evidence of a Creator in nature.

During the Enlightenment, a period spanning the late 17th to the 18th centuries, a significant shift occurred in the way people approached knowledge, reason, and religion. Enlightenment thinkers, often referred to as the philosophes, emphasized human reason, scientific inquiry, and individualism. This intellectual movement posed a direct challenge to the religious and doctrinal authority that had dominated Europe for centuries, leading to the development of new apologetic strategies among conservative evangelical Christians.

The Challenge of Rationalism

Enlightenment thinkers like Voltaire and Bernard de Fontenelle argued that reason and scientific investigation were the primary means to achieve true enlightenment. They viewed religion, particularly Christianity, as a source of ignorance and superstition that had plunged Europe into what they called the Dark Ages. Voltaire, in particular, was a vocal critic of the church, attributing many societal ills to religious dogma and clerical power.

In response, Christian apologists of the era sought to defend the faith by engaging with these new intellectual currents. They aimed to demonstrate that Christianity was not contrary to reason but rather complemented and completed it. These apologists emphasized that true enlightenment could only be achieved through a proper understanding of God's revelation in Scripture, interpreted correctly through the Historical-Grammatical Method.

John Locke and the Reasonableness of Christianity

One of the prominent figures in Christian apologetics during the Enlightenment was John Locke (1632-1704). Locke's work, "The Reasonableness of Christianity," argued that the Christian faith was rational and that the core truths of Christianity could be understood and accepted by reason. Locke maintained that while revelation provided truths that human reason alone could not discover, these truths did not contradict reason. Instead, they provided a fuller understanding of reality.

Locke's approach represented a significant development in apologetics, attempting to bridge the gap between faith and reason. He sought to show that Christian beliefs were not irrational superstitions but were based on historical evidence and logical consistency. By emphasizing the rational foundations of Christianity, Locke provided a counter-narrative to the Enlightenment critique of religion.

William Paley and the Argument from Design

Another key figure was William Paley (1743-1805), whose work "Natural Theology" presented the famous argument from design. Paley argued that the complexity and order evident in the natural world pointed to the existence of an intelligent designer, namely God. Using the analogy of a watchmaker, Paley contended that just as the intricate design of a watch implies a watchmaker, so too does the complexity of the universe imply a divine Creator.

Paley's apologetic method appealed to the Enlightenment emphasis on observation and empirical evidence. By grounding his argument in the natural world, Paley aimed to show that belief in God was supported by reason and scientific observation. This approach sought to demonstrate that Christianity was compatible with the scientific advances of the Enlightenment, countering the narrative that faith and reason were inherently at odds.

The Historical-Grammatical Method

During the Enlightenment, the Historical-Grammatical Method of biblical interpretation gained prominence among conservative evangelical scholars. This method emphasizes understanding the Bible in its historical and literary context, seeking to uncover the original meaning intended by the authors. By focusing on the historical context, grammar, and literary forms of the biblical texts, this method aims to interpret Scripture accurately and faithfully.

The Historical-Grammatical Method provided a robust framework for defending the authority and reliability of the Bible against Enlightenment criticisms. Apologists argued that when the Bible is interpreted correctly, it stands up to rational scrutiny and provides a coherent and comprehensive worldview. This method reinforced the idea that Scripture, far from being an outdated or irrational document, was a trustworthy guide for understanding truth and achieving genuine enlightenment.

In summary, during the Enlightenment, Christian apologists faced the challenge of defending the faith against the rising tide of rationalism and scientific inquiry. Figures like John Locke and William Paley sought to demonstrate that Christianity was rational and supported by empirical evidence. By employing the Historical-Grammatical Method, they aimed to show that the Bible, when interpreted correctly, provided a solid foundation for truth and enlightenment. This period of apologetics emphasized the harmony between faith and reason, seeking to counter the Enlightenment critique of religion and affirm the intellectual credibility of Christianity.

Modern Times

The Battle for the Bible, apologists having to fight liberal-moderate Christianity and their higher criticism, abandoning absolute inerrancy, watering down God's Word with interpretive Bible translations, textual criticism abandoning their primary goal of getting back to the original words of the original texts, and papyrologists trying to redate our earliest papyri to later dates.

Building upon this foundation, modern apologetics from the 19th to the 21st century has been marked by a vigorous defense of the authority, inerrancy, and reliability of the Scriptures. This period has seen conservative evangelical apologists contend with various intellectual challenges and movements that sought to undermine the foundational truths of Christianity.

The Rise of Higher Criticism

Higher criticism, emerging in the 19th century, sought to analyze the Bible using historical and literary methods that often questioned its divine inspiration and historical accuracy. This approach was exemplified by scholars like Julius Wellhausen, who proposed the Documentary Hypothesis, suggesting that the Pentateuch was a compilation of sources rather than the work of Moses. Such theories undermined the traditional understanding of biblical authorship and inerrancy.

In response, conservative scholars like B.B. Warfield and J. Gresham Machen rose to defend the inerrancy of Scripture. Warfield, in particular, emphasized the inspiration and authority of the Bible, arguing that higher criticism often rested on speculative assumptions rather than solid evidence. Machen's work, such as "Christianity and Liberalism," highlighted the stark differences between orthodox Christianity and the liberal theology that higher criticism often supported. He contended that liberalism was fundamentally a different religion, opposed to the historic Christian faith.

The Fundamentalist-Modernist Controversy

The early 20th century witnessed the Fundamentalist-Modernist Controversy, a significant battle within Protestantism over issues of biblical inerrancy, the virgin birth of Christ, and other core doctrines. Fundamentalists, including scholars like R.A. Torrey and Charles Hodge, defended these essential truths against the encroaching liberalism of modernist theology. This controversy led to the publication of "The Fundamentals," a series of essays affirming the core doctrines of Christianity and refuting liberal theological positions.

Textual Criticism and the Quest for the Original Text

Textual criticism, the scholarly discipline focused on determining the original wording of biblical texts, faced significant challenges in the modern era. While earlier textual critics like Westcott and Hort made substantial contributions to the field, the 20th century saw some scholars veering towards skepticism regarding the possibility of recovering the original texts. This skepticism was often fueled by the discovery of numerous textual variants in ancient manuscripts.

In defense of the reliability of Scripture, scholars like F.F. Bruce and Daniel B. Wallace have emphasized the abundance of manuscript evidence supporting the New Testament's textual integrity. Bruce's work, "The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable?" argued convincingly for the historical reliability and textual preservation of the New Testament. Wallace's extensive research and his founding of the Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts (CSNTM) have advanced the field of textual criticism, affirming that we can have a high degree of confidence in the New Testament text.

Defending Biblical Inerrancy

The doctrine of biblical inerrancy has been a central focus for modern evangelical apologists. The Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy (1978), formulated by scholars including Norman Geisler and R.C. Sproul, articulated a clear and robust defense of inerrancy. This document responded to the growing trend of evangelical scholars adopting more critical views of Scripture, reaffirming that the Bible, in its original manuscripts, is without error in all it affirms.

Responding to Interpretive Bible Translations

The proliferation of interpretive Bible translations has also posed challenges for modern apologists. These translations often prioritize readability and contemporary language over strict adherence to the original texts. While accessibility is important, conservative scholars rightly argue that this leads to a dilution of theological precision and doctrinal clarity.

Defenders of more literal translations, such as the updated American Standard Version (UASV) and the semi-literal English Standard Version (ESV), emphasize the importance of staying as close as possible to the original languages. They argue that preserving the exact wording and structure of the original texts is crucial for maintaining doctrinal integrity and theological accuracy.

The UASV's primary purpose is to give the Bible readers what God said by way of his human authors, not what a translator thinks God meant in its place.—Truth Matters! Our primary goal is to be accurate and faithful to the original text. The meaning of a word is the responsibility of the interpreter (i.e., reader), not the translator.—Translating Truth!

Countering Liberal Theology

Liberal theology, with its tendency to reinterpret or discard traditional doctrines, continues to be a significant challenge for evangelical apologists. Figures like Karl Barth and Rudolf Bultmann, while influential in their own right, often promoted views that diverged from orthodox Christianity. Barth’s neo-orthodoxy, for example, while rejecting liberalism's extremes, still posed challenges by emphasizing a more existential interpretation of Scripture.

In response, evangelical theologians such as Carl F.H. Henry and J.I. Packer have provided robust defenses of conservative doctrine. Henry's magnum opus, "God, Revelation, and Authority," offers a comprehensive defense of biblical authority and inerrancy. Packer's "Knowing God" has become a classic, reaffirming the importance of understanding and knowing God through His self-revelation in Scripture.

Engaging with Secularism and Modern Science

The rise of secularism and the increasing influence of modern science have also necessitated a robust apologetic response. Apologists like C.S. Lewis, in "Mere Christianity," and Francis Schaeffer, in "The God Who Is There," engaged effectively with secular thought, demonstrating the rational coherence of the Christian faith. More recently, scholars like William Lane Craig and Alvin Plantinga have provided sophisticated philosophical defenses of theism and Christianity, addressing contemporary challenges posed by atheism and scientific naturalism.

Modern apologetics from the 19th to the 21st century has been marked by a relentless defense of the Bible's authority, inerrancy, and reliability. In the face of higher criticism, liberal theology, textual skepticism, and secularism, conservative evangelical apologists have articulated compelling arguments to uphold the truth of Scripture. By engaging with contemporary thought and maintaining a steadfast commitment to the foundational truths of the faith, they continue to provide a robust defense of Christianity in an ever-changing intellectual landscape.

While Apologetics must address current issues, it should do so systematically. This website blog attempts to present a continuous argument, showing the connections between different aspects of the Christian faith and addressing contemporary challenges in a unified manner.

The traditional division of Christian theology into Apologetics, dogmatics, and ethics shows the need for Apologetics to defend and commend the faith in the context of contemporary thought. Dogmatics describes the content of faith, ethics prescribes Christian conduct, and Apologetics seeks to remove intellectual and moral hindrances to faith.

Christian Apologetics must engage with contemporary thought, addressing pressing questions and demonstrating the relevance and truth of Christian faith. This involves not only defending against objections but also presenting positive arguments that appeal to reason and conscience.

The relationship between religion, science, and philosophy is complex. Science, when limited to its proper sphere, does not conflict with faith. Conflict arises when philosophical assumptions are presented as scientific conclusions. The Christian Apologist recognizes that the Bible is not a textbook of science and does not challenge established scientific findings. Instead, the Apologist addresses philosophical claims that deny human freedom, immortality, or the possibility of miracles.

Philosophy's attempts to form a worldview must account for moral ideals and religious aspirations. The Christian Apologist argues that morality and religion offer authoritative insights into ultimate reality. Philosophical systems that deny or undermine these insights are inadequate both as explanations of reality and as guides for human life.

Christian Apologetics assumes that humans can know truth about God, the world, and themselves. It rejects skepticism and relativism, affirming that knowledge corresponds to reality. The Apologist draws on philosophical insights while recognizing their limitations, integrating them into a broader Christian understanding of truth.

Finally, Christianity as a historical reality must be defended against literary and historical criticism. The credibility of the literary sources and the historical reality of divine revelation and redemption in Christ are crucial for Apologetics. The Christian claim of absolute and universal truth must be demonstrated in comparison with other religions, showing Christianity's superiority in meeting human needs and fulfilling religious aspirations.

In conclusion, Christian Apologetics aims to defend and commend the faith by addressing contemporary challenges, engaging with science and philosophy, and affirming the truth of the Christian worldview.

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).

Alfred Ernest Garvie

Alfred Ernest Garvie was a Congregational minister and seminary professor. He is the author of The Ritschlian Theology and A Handbook of Christian Apologetics



bottom of page