top of page
Writer's pictureEdward D. Andrews

How Can the Bible Affirm Both Divine Sovereignty and Human Freedom?

The Biblical Perspective on Destiny and Free Will


The question of whether the Bible supports the concept of destiny or predestination is one that requires careful examination of Scripture. The Bible affirms both God's sovereignty and human free will, but it does not support the notion that God has fixed an individual's destiny in a way that removes their freedom to choose. Rather, the Bible presents a view of God as knowing all possibilities and outcomes based on human decisions, yet allowing people the freedom to make those decisions.


The idea that God has not fixed your destiny is deeply rooted in the Biblical narrative. From the beginning, God has given humanity the freedom to choose, and this freedom is evident in the choices made by individuals throughout the Scriptures. Jehovah's sovereignty does not negate human freedom but rather works in harmony with it, allowing His plans to unfold without coercing individuals into predetermined outcomes.



The Nature of God’s Foreknowledge


Foreknowledge, as presented in the Bible, is not about God predetermining every detail of a person's life but about His comprehensive knowledge of all possibilities. Jehovah knows the potentialities of free will decisions and how they would play out in every conceivable situation. This understanding is crucial to balancing the sovereignty of God with the free will of creatures.


The Bible provides several examples of God's foreknowledge that do not imply predestination. For instance, in the case of Cain and Abel, God warned Cain about the potential consequences of his anger, saying, “If you do well, will you not be accepted? And if you do not do well, sin is crouching at the door. Its desire is for you, but you must rule over it” (Genesis 4:7). Here, God knew the potential outcome of Cain's actions, but He did not force Cain to choose one way or the other. Cain’s decision to kill Abel was made of his own free will, not because God had predetermined it.


Similarly, in the story of Jonah, God sent Jonah to Nineveh with a message of impending judgment, yet the people of Nineveh repented, and God relented from the disaster He had planned (Jonah 3:10). God knew the potential outcomes but allowed the people of Nineveh to choose repentance freely.


Divine Sovereignty and Human Free Will: A Biblical Harmony


The Bible consistently affirms that while God is sovereign and in control of the overarching narrative of history, He allows individuals to make choices within that framework. This is evident in verses like Deuteronomy 30:19, where Jehovah says, “I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore, choose life, that you and your offspring may live.” This verse clearly presents a choice, showing that humans are not bound by a predetermined destiny but are responsible for the decisions they make.


In the New Testament, Jesus continually called people to repentance and faith, emphasizing the necessity of personal decision-making. In Mark 1:15, Jesus says, “The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent and believe in the gospel.” This call to repentance is a clear indication that Jesus expected individuals to respond freely to God’s invitation.


The Misconception of Predestination


Predestination, as commonly understood in certain theological circles, suggests that God has predetermined who will be saved and who will be condemned, thereby eliminating human free will. However, this concept is unbiblical and does not align with the overall message of Scripture. The Bible teaches that while God is aware of all possible outcomes, He does not impose a fixed destiny on anyone.


The case of Judas Iscariot is often cited as an example of predestination, but a closer examination of Scripture reveals otherwise. Judas had the freedom to choose whether to betray Jesus or not. Although Jesus knew what Judas would do (John 13:21-27), this knowledge did not force Judas to act in a particular way. Judas’s betrayal was a result of his own choices, not a predetermined destiny imposed by God.


Romans 8:29-30 is another passage often misinterpreted as supporting predestination. However, the context reveals that these verses refer to God's foreknowledge and the plan for those who freely choose to follow Him, rather than an arbitrary selection of individuals. The phrase “those whom he foreknew” indicates God’s awareness of who would freely respond to His call, not a predetermination of their fate.



Biblical Evidence Against Predestination


Throughout the Bible, we see that God's relationship with humanity is characterized by calls to repentance, faith, and obedience—none of which would be meaningful if human choices were not genuinely free. The warnings and exhortations found in Scripture assume that people have the ability to choose how they will respond.


For example, in Ezekiel 18:23, Jehovah says, “Have I any pleasure in the death of the wicked... and not rather that he should turn from his way and live?” This verse shows God’s desire for people to turn from their wickedness and choose life, which would be meaningless if their destinies were already fixed.


In the New Testament, the apostle Paul emphasizes the importance of free will in salvation. In 1 Timothy 2:4, Paul writes that God “desires all people to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.” This universal desire for salvation contradicts the notion of predestination, which would imply that only a select few are destined for salvation regardless of their choices.


Furthermore, the concept of predestination undermines the Biblical teaching on the justice and righteousness of God. If God were to predestine some people to salvation and others to damnation without regard to their choices, it would contradict His just and loving nature. The Bible consistently portrays God as fair and just, holding individuals accountable for their actions and decisions.


The Role of Human Free Will in Salvation


Salvation, according to the Bible, is a gift from God that requires a response from the individual. Ephesians 2:8-9 states, “For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast.” While salvation is entirely by grace, it is through faith—a personal response to God's grace. This response is an act of free will, not something coerced or predetermined.


The concept of free will is further emphasized in the teachings of Jesus. In Revelation 3:20, Jesus says, “Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and eat with him, and he with me.” The imagery of Jesus standing at the door and knocking implies that the individual has the choice to open the door or not. This choice is a clear exercise of free will, demonstrating that God does not force Himself upon anyone.


The parable of the prodigal son (Luke 15:11-32) is another powerful illustration of free will in the context of salvation. The younger son chooses to leave his father’s house and live a life of sin, but later he chooses to return. The father does not coerce the son to return but eagerly welcomes him when he does. This parable highlights the importance of personal choice in the relationship between God and humanity.


How Divine Sovereignty and Human Freedom Coexist


While it may seem difficult to reconcile God's sovereignty with human free will, the Bible presents these two concepts as complementary rather than contradictory. God's sovereignty is His ultimate authority and control over all things, while human freedom is the ability to make meaningful choices within the framework of God's sovereign plan.


One way to understand this relationship is through the concept of God's permissive will. God, in His sovereignty, permits certain events to occur based on the free will decisions of individuals. For example, God allowed Pharaoh to harden his heart in response to Moses’ demands to let the Israelites go (Exodus 8:15, 32). While God could have forced Pharaoh to comply, He permitted Pharaoh to exercise his free will, even though it resulted in judgment.


In Romans 9:22-23, Paul speaks of God enduring “with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, in order to make known the riches of his glory for vessels of mercy.” This passage does not mean that God predestined some people to destruction, but rather that He allows individuals to choose their path, even if it leads to judgment, while still working out His sovereign purposes.


Another important aspect to consider is that God's foreknowledge does not equate to predestination. Just because God knows what choices individuals will make does not mean He has predetermined those choices. God's foreknowledge is like seeing all possible outcomes based on the decisions people freely make. This understanding allows for the coexistence of divine sovereignty and human freedom without contradiction.



Biblical Examples Illustrating Free Will and Sovereignty


The story of King Saul provides an example of how human free will operates within God's sovereign plan. Saul was chosen by God to be the first king of Israel, but his disobedience led to his rejection by God (1 Samuel 15:26). Saul had the freedom to obey or disobey God, and his choices ultimately led to his downfall. Despite God's sovereignty in choosing Saul, Saul’s free will played a crucial role in determining his fate.


Another example is found in the life of King David. David was chosen by God to be king after Saul, but his reign was marked by both triumphs and failures. David’s sins, such as his adultery with Bathsheba and the murder of her husband Uriah, were the result of his free will decisions. Yet, despite these failures, God’s sovereign plan for David’s lineage leading to the Messiah was still fulfilled (2 Samuel 7:12-16).


These examples show that while God is sovereign and His plans will ultimately be accomplished, human beings are still responsible for their actions and the consequences of their decisions. God’s sovereignty does not negate human free will but rather works through it to achieve His purposes.


Theological Implications of Rejecting Predestination


Rejecting the concept of predestination has important theological implications, particularly regarding the nature of God and the human experience of salvation. If predestination is rejected, it emphasizes the justice and fairness of God, who desires that all people come to repentance and be saved (2 Peter 3:9). It also highlights the importance of evangelism and the call to share the gospel with all people, knowing that each person has the opportunity to respond freely to God's invitation.


Furthermore, rejecting predestination affirms the intrinsic value of human beings as moral agents capable of making meaningful choices. This perspective upholds the dignity of individuals, created in the image of God, with the capacity to choose their destiny.


It also reinforces the biblical teaching on accountability and judgment. If individuals are free to choose, they are also accountable for their choices. The Bible consistently teaches that people will be judged based on their actions and decisions (Revelation 20:12-13). This judgment would be unjust if those actions were predetermined and not the result of free will.


Practical Applications for Believers


Understanding the balance between divine sovereignty and human free will has practical implications for believers. It encourages a life of responsibility, knowing that our choices have real consequences. Believers are called to live in obedience to God, knowing that while He is sovereign, He has given us the freedom to choose how we will live our lives.


It also fosters a deeper sense of trust in God’s plan. Even though we are free to make choices, we can trust that God is ultimately in control and will work all things together for good for those who love Him (Romans 8:28). This trust in God's sovereignty provides peace and assurance in the midst of life's uncertainties.


Moreover, understanding that salvation is a gift that requires a free response motivates believers to share the gospel with others. Knowing that each person has the opportunity to respond to God’s invitation should compel us to be active in evangelism, sharing the good news with those around us.


The Bible affirms both divine sovereignty and human freedom, rejecting the concept of predestination as unbiblical. God’s foreknowledge includes all potential outcomes based on human free will decisions, but it does not predetermine those decisions. This understanding allows for a harmonious relationship between God's sovereignty and human responsibility, where individuals are free to choose their path and are held accountable for their choices.

God’s sovereignty is not diminished by human freedom; rather, it is glorified as He accomplishes His purposes through the free decisions of His creatures. As believers, we are called to live responsibly, trust in God’s plan, and share the gospel with others, knowing that each person has the opportunity to respond freely to God’s call. This balance between sovereignty and free will is a central theme in Scripture and is essential for a proper understanding of the nature of God and the human experience of salvation.



How Does Foreknowledge Differ from Foreordination?


Understanding the Distinction: Foreknowledge Does Not Equal Foreordination


A fundamental distinction that must be understood in the biblical context is the difference between God's foreknowledge and the concept of foreordination or predestination. While these terms are often conflated, they describe two very different aspects of God's relationship with time and human freedom.


Foreknowledge refers to God's omniscient awareness of all events before they occur, including all potential decisions that human beings might make. Foreordination or predestination suggests that God has determined every event, including human decisions, beforehand, thereby removing any real freedom of choice. The Bible, however, supports the view that while God knows in advance what choices people will freely make, He does not fix those choices, allowing human beings to exercise genuine free will.


The Nature of Foreknowledge


To grasp this concept, it is essential to first explore the nature of foreknowledge as presented in Scripture. God's foreknowledge is tied to His omniscience, His ability to know everything that could possibly happen in every conceivable situation. This does not imply that God dictates every choice or event; rather, He knows what will happen based on the decisions that free agents will make.


Consider how Jehovah addresses the Israelites in Deuteronomy 30:19, “I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live.” Here, God presents the people with a genuine choice and calls them to exercise their free will. The outcome of this choice is known to God, but it is not predetermined by Him; it is contingent on their decision.


Similarly, in 1 Peter 1:2, believers are described as "chosen according to the foreknowledge of God the Father." This does not mean that God has arbitrarily chosen some for salvation and others for damnation. Rather, God, in His foreknowledge, understands who will respond to His call and who will not, but the response remains a free choice for each individual.



Chronological vs. Logical Priority: A Theological Insight


To further clarify the distinction between foreknowledge and foreordination, it is helpful to consider the concepts of chronological priority and logical priority.


Chronological Priority refers to the sequence of events as they unfold in time. In this sense, God's knowledge of a future event is chronologically prior to the event itself because God exists outside of time and can see the entire timeline of history simultaneously. However, this chronological precedence does not imply that God’s knowledge causes the event.


Logical Priority suggests that while God's foreknowledge comes before the event chronologically, the event itself is logically prior to God's knowledge of it. In other words, the event does not happen because God foreknows it; rather, God foreknows the event because it will happen. The event is logically prior to the foreknowledge in the sense that the event determines the content of what is foreknown.


For example, consider Judas Iscariot's betrayal of Jesus. Jesus knew that Judas would betray Him, as seen in John 13:21, where He says, "Truly, truly, I say to you, one of you will betray me." However, this knowledge did not cause Judas to betray Jesus. Judas made a free decision to betray Christ, and it was this decision that was known to God. The event (Judas’s betrayal) logically determines what God foreknows, not the other way around.



Illustrating Foreknowledge with a Shadow


An effective analogy to understand how foreknowledge operates without determining events is the analogy of a shadow. When you see the shadow of a person coming around the corner, you know that the person is about to appear. However, the shadow does not cause the person to be there; rather, the person’s presence determines the existence of the shadow.


Similarly, God’s foreknowledge is like the shadow of a future event. God knows the event will happen because it is going to happen, but His knowledge of it does not cause it to happen. The reality of the event determines the shadow of foreknowledge, not the other way around. Just as the shadow is a consequence of the person’s presence, God’s foreknowledge is a consequence of the actual event that occurs freely.


In this way, God's foreknowledge does not remove human freedom. It simply reflects the fact that God, who is outside of time, sees the entirety of history at once and knows all possible outcomes based on the decisions that individuals will make. If a person were to make a different choice, God's foreknowledge would correspondingly be different. This understanding safeguards the integrity of free will while maintaining God’s omniscience.



The Infallible Barometer Analogy


Another helpful illustration is to compare God's foreknowledge to an infallible barometer. A barometer can predict the weather with perfect accuracy, but it does not determine the weather. The weather determines the reading on the barometer, not the other way around.


In the same way, God’s foreknowledge is like an infallible barometer of future events. God knows what the future will hold, but this knowledge does not constrain or dictate the future. The future unfolds according to the free will decisions of individuals, and God's foreknowledge simply tracks those decisions without influencing them. The foreknowledge reflects the reality of what will happen without imposing any necessity upon it.


The Mistaken View of Foreknowledge as a Constraint


There is a common misconception that God's foreknowledge somehow constrains human choices, making them inevitable or predetermined. However, this view is fundamentally flawed. The presence of foreknowledge does not impose any restriction on the freedom of human decisions.


Consider a timeline with a specific event, such as Judas’s betrayal of Jesus, marked on it. If God is outside of time and sees the entire timeline, He knows that Judas will betray Jesus. However, this knowledge does not cause Judas to act in that way. Judas's betrayal would occur even if God's knowledge of it were somehow removed from the equation. The event happens freely and independently of God's knowledge of it.


This understanding leads to the conclusion that God's foreknowledge is compatible with human freedom. If Judas had chosen not to betray Jesus, God’s foreknowledge would reflect that different choice. Therefore, foreknowledge does not prejudice or constrain the occurrence of an event. Instead, it is the event itself, freely chosen, that determines what God foreknows.



The Biblical Case Against Foreordination


The distinction between foreknowledge and foreordination is crucial in refuting the idea of predestination. Predestination suggests that every action and decision is predetermined by God, leaving no room for free will. However, the Bible repeatedly emphasizes the freedom of human beings to choose their path, and the responsibility they bear for those choices.


In Genesis 3:15, God foretold the enmity between the serpent and the seed of the woman, ultimately culminating in Christ's victory over Satan. While this was part of God's sovereign plan, the individuals involved in this unfolding drama exercised their free will throughout. Judas Iscariot’s betrayal of Jesus was a free decision that fit within God’s foreseen plan, but it was not predetermined by God in a way that nullified Judas's moral responsibility.


Similarly, the prophecies concerning the suffering and death of Jesus, such as those found in Isaiah 53, were known to God and foretold centuries in advance. Yet, those who played a role in bringing about these events, including Judas, Pilate, and the Jewish leaders, acted out of their own free will. Their actions were foreknown by God, but they were not coerced or predetermined by Him.



Conclusion: Free Will Determines Foreknowledge


The key takeaway from this discussion is that it is the free decisions of human beings that determine what God foreknows about them, rather than foreknowledge determining their decisions. This understanding preserves the biblical teaching of human responsibility and the moral accountability of each individual for their actions.


Foreknowledge and free will coexist harmoniously in the biblical narrative. God’s omniscience allows Him to see all possible outcomes and know what will happen based on human choices, but this knowledge does not bind or constrain those choices. The reality of human freedom remains intact, and individuals are called to make decisions in accordance with God's will, with the assurance that their choices have genuine significance and are not merely the result of a predetermined plan.


In essence, while God's foreknowledge is comprehensive and perfect, it does not eliminate human freedom. Rather, it testifies to the majesty of a God who, in His sovereignty, has created a world where free creatures can make meaningful choices, choices that He knows but does not dictate. This view upholds the biblical teaching that we are responsible for our actions and will be judged accordingly, all within the scope of God's sovereign plan that accommodates our freedom.


About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220 books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).


RECOMMENDED READING


Comments


bottom of page